- What We Do
- Enterprise Solutions
- Digital Transformation
- Business Applications
- Web Solutions
- Training
- Industries
- Insights
- About Us
- Talk to Us
Connect every credit or debit note to the transaction it changes. MetaDynamic builds adjustment workflows with reason codes, approval and accounting handoff so corrections remain traceable.
Configurable AI agents · NLP & voice · Workflow automation · Analytics
| Reference | Original invoice | Adjustment | Reason | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN-204 | INV-1008 | 240.00 | Return | Review |
| DN-105 | INV-1011 | 85.00 | Price correction | Review |
| CN-205 | INV-1017 | 120.00 | Short supply | Approved |
Filter by owner and period to prioritise the work.
Open the underlying records to investigate exceptions.
Track the next action against an agreed business measure.
Choose the modules your team needs. The agreed configuration defines included features, data access and connected systems.
Link an adjustment to its original invoice or commercial record.
Distinguish returns, pricing corrections and other approved adjustment types.
Retain supporting documents and the decision behind the adjustment.
Transfer approved changes with reconciliation and error handling.
A return, pricing correction or agreed commercial adjustment starts from the original invoice. The requester selects a reason and adds the evidence required for that adjustment type. Finance reviews the amount and accounting treatment before release. The resulting note stays connected to the source transaction, the approval and any return record so customer and finance teams can explain the change.
Configure an app-specific agent to prepare an adjustment explanation from the original invoice, return and reason code; require approval before posting.
Posting, payment release and financial adjustments require authorised approval.
Agent tools, allowed actions, knowledge sources and access boundaries are agreed during solution design. The example question shows a proposed interaction, not a live AI connection.
Ask an agreed business question, retrieve only permitted records and show the source behind the answer. Unsupported questions should return a clear limit rather than an invented response.
Optional speech input can capture the question or task. Show the transcript for confirmation, keep typing available and validate the chosen language, device and working environment.
A validated adjustment request follows the authority matrix; the approved note returns a ledger reference.
Use supported connectors and event-driven workflows where suitable. For a legacy screen-based task, RPA can be scoped with controlled credentials, exception handling, monitoring and recovery. Record identifiers and duplicate checks help prevent a retry from creating a second transaction.
Connect the selected operational measures to their source records. Agree ownership, filters and refresh intervals so the team knows what the numbers mean.
Compare the current period with an agreed baseline. Separate open work from completed records.
Investigate by owner, date, entity or location where those fields are available and permitted.
Follow the exception to its source and assign an action. Validate the definition before using it as a KPI.
Operational dashboards can be extended with Power BI or your approved analytics platform. Predictive analysis is scoped only where historical data, evaluation and monitoring support it.
MetaDynamic manages integration design, configuration and testing. Your users work through the application; your technical team gets clear ownership, monitoring and support arrangements.
Finance, purchasing, inventory, production and maintenance records; SAP HR data where relevant.
Review the deployed SAP product, authorised objects and supported connector or interface.
Operational records for Infor LN, M3 or CloudSuite, according to your deployed product.
Confirm available Infor OS/ION services, permissions and transaction coverage.
Dynamics 365, Microsoft 365, identity and analytics services relevant to the application.
Select licensed connectors and the appropriate Dynamics 365 or Microsoft data source.
Your existing master data, transaction records and agreed extension points.
Choose a supported interface, controlled file exchange or supervised RPA after system review.
Compatibility is confirmed against your product version, licensed services, permissions, required fields and supported operations. Native connectors, vendor interfaces, file exchange and RPA are different options—not a promise that every platform connects without setup.
Use a focused mobile or tablet experience to review a journal or approve an exception. Give laptop and desktop users more room for lists, comparisons and detailed reporting.
Responsive layouts, keyboard access and touch controls are part of the design brief. Camera, barcode, voice and offline options are included only where they suit the task and have been tested on the agreed devices.
Voice availability depends on the chosen speech service, language, microphone permission and environment. Sensitive information stays visible only to the authorised user; noisy or shared areas need a practical alternative.
Security requirements belong in the application design and acceptance criteria. Confirm the controls for the selected hosting, identity, data and AI services before release.
Scope SSO and MFA with the approved identity provider. Map access by role, entity and record, and separate preparation from approval where required.
Agree encryption, data location, retention, backup and recovery requirements. Store credentials in a managed secret store and minimise sensitive data in logs.
Apply source-system permissions to retrieval. Define permitted AI services, data handling and retention; log tool actions and require approval for consequential changes.
Test access boundaries, integrations and recovery scenarios. Agree vulnerability testing, monitoring and support ownership for the deployed configuration.
Start with minutes spent researching and preparing an adjustment. Measure the baseline, validate the target in a pilot, and include implementation and ongoing costs.
Measure for this app: Minutes spent researching and preparing an adjustment. The starting values are illustrative assumptions, not MetaDynamic customer results or guaranteed savings. Time released is capacity; it becomes cash savings only when costs are actually reduced.
Monthly hours = volume × max(current minutes − target minutes, 0) ÷ 60. Annual realised value = monthly hours × loaded hourly cost × realisation percentage × 12. First-year investment = one-time investment + 12 × monthly running cost. ROI = (annual realised value − first-year investment) ÷ first-year investment × 100. Simple payback = one-time investment ÷ (monthly realised value − monthly running cost), where the denominator is positive.
The model assumes 12 months at steady-state use. It excludes ramp-up delays, financing, tax and unquantified benefits. Avoid double-counting the same time savings across applications. Enter your own values; all calculation stays in your browser.
Test a partial return, a price correction, a rejected request and an attempted adjustment beyond the permitted balance.
Review adjustment reasons, invoice references, returns process and posting rules. Confirm the users, devices, data owners and measures of success.
Configure the agreed workflows, screens, AI options and interfaces. Test normal records, permissions, exceptions and recovery with business users.
Train users, reconcile migrated data and introduce the application in a controlled rollout. Compare measured outcomes with the agreed baseline.
The proposal specifies the application modules, user roles, AI-agent actions, analytics, deployment and support included in your configuration. The interface walkthrough uses example records; delivered screens and enabled actions are validated against the agreed scope.
Relevant connection options include SAP, Infor, Microsoft, Custom ERP. We review your product version, licensed interfaces, permissions and required operations before confirming compatibility. MetaDynamic manages the agreed integration and testing.
These can be scoped around the application workflow. Natural-language responses need approved sources and permission-aware retrieval; voice requires a supported language, device and speech service. Posting, payment release and financial adjustments require authorised approval.
MetaDynamic can deliver and support the agreed integrations. The implementation may use native connectors, vendor APIs, controlled files or RPA. Authentication, licensing, data mapping and error handling still need to be configured and tested.
We design the selected tasks responsively and agree a device/browser test matrix before rollout. Native mobile, offline, scanning and voice capabilities are separate scope decisions where needed; they are not implied by a responsive website.
Security controls are agreed for the deployed architecture and tested before release. ROI is estimated from your process volumes, measured time, costs and benefit-realisation assumptions, then checked after a pilot. The calculator is an estimate, not a guaranteed return.
Share your current process, core systems and priorities. We will map the right application scope, integration options, security requirements and measurable business case.
Related applications: Financial Accounting · Invoicing & Billing · Receivables Management